Wednesday, 16 January 2019

THE GOD-FULL, THE GOD-LESS & THE HUMBLE IGNORANT


In life, almost every person you meet will have one question in common. Where do we come from and where do go from here? While seeking the answer consciously or unconsciously, people get broadly divided into two categories, Godless and people of God. Both are liars.
There are different exemplifications and explanations of the concept of God in various religions. The common thread is that it is not a physical entity. God functions out of the realms of the physical world. This very idea turns every debate between a believer and a non-believer futile, many times nasty and always inconclusive. However if your aren’t debating but seriously conversing with the objective of learning something, you will find the following types of people.

GOD-FULLS

A large number of believers with robust faith are never able to give straight up, rational answers about the basic questions of origin and functioning of God.  They often believe or tend towards personifying God, i.e. outside this physical world which is bound in space and time continuum and is just a fragmentation of God’s imagination, there lays the real world, the world from where the soul originated and where it is bound to return. In that world, they will meet God, perhaps physically or in a metaphysical state to explain which, they or this physical world doesn’t contain correct vocabulary.  This explanation is generally based on their respective religious text and if questioned on the proof, the argument always boils down to Faith and faith is personal.
Then there are the new age mellow believers who believe in this obscure concept of “spirituality”. They throw away statements like God is love or God lies in every being. They are often disciples of some Spiritual Guide or Masters that delivers mellow sermons which often are hacked, mellow versions of traditional religious texts, repackaged as modern day wisdom. These seekers have found a comfort food that is totally harmless and they are happy toying with it as long as it is risk free.

GODLESS

The biggest cult in today’s times solely based on arrogance and a weird causeless rebellion is Atheism. Whenever you will encounter a debate on the topic of God more often than not, the self-proclaimed atheist would be oozing with smug demeanour, hateful insults and overstating deliberations that they memorized from memes and videos of Christopher Hitchens. I too was a part of this cult some years ago, but I have long since come across limitations of my knowledge. Now there have been some extra-ordinary brilliant people in history that were vociferous non-believers. But there non-belief was a result of life-long study and introspection. 
A very interesting proclamation of the generally young, newfound atheists is their everlasting love for science. “I believe in Science, bitch!” is what they claim. It doesn’t really matter that many of them aren’t even science students, good enough to get a Bachelors Honours Degree in any branch of science. What they do believe in is memes.

THE HUMBLE IGNORANT

The pursuit of the noble question often leads to a frustrating cul-de-sac. The admittance of your ignorance and limitations is terrifying yet humbling and later on satisfying. Nobody is brought up as a perpetual seeker. No matter your faith, nationality or culture, knowing or unknowingly, we all are taught to stop questioning at some point and claim “This is it!” But sometimes, if we question further than the point of “this is it” we come to see our limitations. The limitation to the eternal question of “where from and where to” of our life is that it is impossible to know the answer in the physical world.  A person faced with this humbling limitation if then declares that he will “live his life as if God exists” in my opinion is a wise believer accepting the need of a moral authority to whom the conscience is answerable.
This humble ignorant can neither be a fundamentalist radical nor a nihilist slacker. This person is acknowledging the limitations of his conscience and confronting the frail predatory nature of his being by putting a higher moral weight on it. The predicament of the humble ignorant and his attempt to overcome it are comparable to meditating with a point of focus like a small dot on a blank sheet.  Just like a meditative device helps one to put the mind in an integrated state from scattered thoughts, the humble ignorant is working towards integration of the conscience and morality.
As far as I believe, the humble ignorant might be more close to knowledge than all the others claiming the authority over truth.   

Saturday, 8 September 2018

A COMMODITY CALLED EDUCATION


Solidarity in society is dangerous to the authority. The first thing a government in collaboration with corporate structure and there inculcated greed does to a society is to break solidarity in the society. The reason for it is to make walking zombies of the humans with no concerns about their brothers and sisters and only hunting for consumption and surviving in the society as commodity fetishists. That’s the only role a ruler dreams of who is too mighty headed and wants everybody to look away when they are out there to turn the society on its head as per there unilateral view of it. The first step to break the society’s solidarity and mutual concern for it is PRIVATIZATION OF EDUCATION.

In any group with mutual empathy i.e. a family, friends or a team, special care and utmost attention is given to the people with special needs. In better-developed parts of the world, preferential access to public spaces and transport to the people with special needs is a norm. That is how empathy evolves. If a child in the family is less healthy than others, parents care more about that kid’s nutrition and health. A trekker struggling to cross the loose-roped bridge is helped and many times carried by his comrades, that is how all of them reach the destination and achieve their goal.
However, the public education system in the country like India fails this logic. The public institutes of primary education are worst for weaker economic and social sections. Even the public education systems get better in the major cities and towns. This, whether a planned or unplanned practice; leads to total negation and repudiation of the already downtrodden. It turns education into a privilege and a commodity of desire rather than a right and it produces job-searching hounds rather than pupils and seekers who ask questions.
 The society built on this educational model treats intellectuals, thinkers, researchers, the people who want to dedicate their lives to study and engage in the attributes of human species that separate it from animals, as freeloaders. The same society, however, respects and admires MBAs and bankers whose sole education is basically financial manipulation and no rectification for human life whatsoever. This is the reason why we see a very minuscule number of science students from high-schools getting into actual scientific study and research in their post-secondary education.
When education costs so much, the pupil then doesn’t want to remain a pupil; rather they wait impatiently to turn into a professional and pay off those high education loans. In these modern. State of the art higher-educational institutes, a maximum number of students is either from a hyper-privileged class, who are just earning social acceptance via a degree or middle-class children aspiring to become a part of the privileged class. In institutes like these, you hardly ever see political student bodies or socially motivated activities.
  The problem arises when there are still institutes in the country that were created in a different time with a different aim that still provides quality education and their tuition fees allows pupils to remain pupils and have a mind of their own and after completing education take some time to introspect and think about the quality rather than quantity of their work.  These institutes have been nurturing  immense talent since many past decades. The students, as well as teachers in such institutes, have a passion for education.  
These are the kind of institutes whose students from any background can make experimental work and publish research papers and create new dimensions in their field because the government and society share responsibility so that they better society in some manner. In India, these are the institutes like NID, SPA, IITs, JNU, AIIMS, FTII, JJ institute etc.
In past years many times different governments have shown the desire to privatize some of these institutes as they are “lacking the ability to churn profit” and “turning into a liability”. If giving affordable education to the youth of the country is a liability then what is the “duty” of the government? If a government cannot provide equal education, equal healthcare and equal justice to all citizens then what is even the purpose of the government and what is the idea of a nation?
When a responsible and dutiful parent educates their child; they give her/him the best opportunity as per their ability. They don’t ask for profits. They want them to be a better human being who can take care of themselves and when capable even stand up for their parents as well. If the governments and state pretend to be parents and guardians , then why aren’t they ready to take up the responsibility and act like one?   

Sunday, 6 May 2018

DIARY OF A STRANGE MAN : THE PURPOSE


THE PURPOSE

The bouts of tiredness, insomnia, and headaches were now constant. He was now accustomed to feeling disgruntled all the time. He wanted to do things but couldn’t see the point of doing anything. It was a great loss, the loss of appetite for the sense of achievement.
A thought would come to his mind, “what if this keeps going on like this for the whole life; if every day will be carried out with the same helpless manner of unhappy resentment?  Or will that be just an idea of a life, constant tedium of wasting time deliberately just to think “What the day was all about?” at the end of it. This thought made him see one thing clearly. He could now empathize with the origin and idea of GOD. It is the dissatisfaction of the slow descent towards nothingness that urges humans to seek a purpose and yet when the grips of the limited conscience don’t allow the thoughts to flow fearlessly, comes alive the promise of eternity.
Thus the rituals and manifestations of the cults and paths to achieve God generate purpose. No purpose can ever surpass the enigma of the purpose that is unachievable in the physical world.
Every day then becomes a devotion to rise above the average miserable person who is meandering aimlessly through the woods thinking it is home. But the person of God thinks he has found the shepherd and they will know the home once they reach there and they will only reach there when they will complete the journey and this journey will be completed when the distances assigned for each day are covered. They never see that they are covering the same mile every day, walking in circles, never going anywhere. The promised destination is unknown and its ambiguity is its locus of attraction.  
Whether you are lost without knowing it or you are lost and helpless about it, you are just, lost.
Pondering on these thoughts he presumed that just like the person with the tedium of rituals if he too can conjure his own purpose, he might start to fill the emptiness. He too can pretend to be in the right direction and stride towards it with zeal and determination.
Still, he would be lost, no matter what he presumes and pretends. If the purpose is not quantifiable then there is no purpose at all and no quantifiable purpose could be eternal, which nullifies the very idea for the quest of a purpose. This thought shadowed him and another day passed.

Sunday, 25 June 2017

TWO KASHMIRIS, AN ARMY MAN AND A TRAIN


Philosophy and travel are inter-linked, especially train travel. The view from the window, the idle journey, cacophonous smells from various platforms, glimpses of stations passing by and the perpetual periodic rattling and rustling sound of train’s coaches brings out the metaphysical quests of a lonesome traveller, just like those rhythmic metal beating in the metal market made Rumi dance in philosophical ecstasy. A long train journey is a perfect metaphor for the journey of life.
I personally am an appreciator of long train journeys but most of my train journeys have been one-night travel to New Delhi which is pretty much spent sleeping. However one day in a long train journey from Jammu to Mumbai I found myself between a rock and a hard place.
It was ending January of 2015 and I was in particularly good mood that day. I was returning from a satisfying two week long home visit after four months on a sunny day after many bone rattling, piercing cold days of concluding “Chillai Kalaan”( forty days of harsh winter) in Kashmir. Another reason for my happiness was my 3rd Tier A.C.’s reserved upper-side berth in a surprisingly busy schedule. I arrived around ten minutes before the departure time and was welcomed by the nice Gujarati boy from Vasai, Mumbai. He was in his early 30s, an artificial jewellery merchant and visited Jammu once a month for business. In the main compartment an elderly Sikh couple was sitting and opposite to them an army man in his ending 40s. The army bags, trunk, his demeanour and my armed force background clearly depicted that he was an army man who joined the force as a Sipahi(trooper) and now has reached the rank of Havaldar probably.  Hav. Prefix to his name on his trunk proved me right. Courtesy glances were shared and small talk with the nice Gujarati boy began. As the train started with the jerk, I heard Kashmiri in thick and shrill accent which is generally attributed to the boys of South Kashmir, the Pulwama-Anantnag belt, the accent that is total contrast to the sophisticated & slightly anglicised and Urdu-fused accent of the city boys schooled from Tyndale Biscoe and Burn hall.
Two Kashmiri boys of around 19-20 bubbled with fresh cigarette-odour joined in looking around the recently filled compartment. They had that familiar insecure yet posing glance that borders on rude and rogue which is common to many young kids from interiors of Kashmir when they are outside Kashmir among Indians.
As the journey began the elderly Sikh couple joined another elderly Sikh couple in the next compartment. Either they were known to them or they had too much in common. This left just the two Kashmiri boys and an army man in the same compartment for a 30 hour long journey. To me this juxtaposition was slightly amusing and a bit uncomfortable. I have a bi-polar public alter ego that urges me to intervene in every public argument and shuts me down even with slightest and dumbest instigating confrontation the very next moment.  So I decided no matter what, I have my headphones which I will put on if an argument breaks out and listen to the spat silently.
There is a primitive urge in human beings especially in our part of the world to know the person sitting next to you in a long journey. Basically to see if they conform to the perception you have conjured of them. This urge led the Kashmiri boys to initiate the conversation. It was the archaic, cursory small talk of where to and where from. The army man was posted in Baramullah and was on leave citing a heart condition worsening due to long hours in chilling cold in a semi-covered check-post. He hailed from a village in Dahod, Gujarat. The two boys were cousins and hailed from Avantipora, near Tral in South Kashmir. They studied Computer Science Engineering (Surprise, surprise) in “some trust” college of technology in Rajpura, Punjab. They were off to Vashi in Navi Mumbai for industrial training which basically meant two months of fun filled holiday on the expense of their elder cousin who worked in a bank in Vashi.
Another common human trait is to find commonality among strangers. I successfully managed to find it with army man due to my father’s armed force background and my Kashmiri ancestry and a Bhua (paternal aunt) from Tral affirmed my connection to the boys. Everything was cordial and “unity in diversity”.  I expressed my regret over the cancelled long holiday past year in Kashmir due to the devastating floods.  The army man shared his concerns about “Chilai-Kalaan”, troublesome floods and army’s rescue operations in floods. The boys suggested places to visit in Kashmir in different seasons, the travesty of floods and the incredible rescue operations that followed especially by the Kashmiris living in India and abroad displaying love for the motherland. Everybody expressed their love for Wazwaan, I mentioned my peculiar affinity to mix roganjosh and yakhni with rice. There was a meaty, mouth-watering trance for a few seconds in the compartment. The nice Gujarati boy was silently relishing the Kashmir talks and expressed his desire for a tour. Surprisingly, he has never visited the place due to the “issue” in his 12 years of constant visits to Jammu. I, the Kashmiri boys and the army man vociferously explained to him that the conflict hasn’t reached to the tourists. Of course he should visit on the non-curfew days. His less expressive face emitted some astonishment. Unlike Kashmiri leaders, ex-armymen and random film people with distant Kashmiri ancestry in TV studios, this group of Kashmiris, armyman and Non-resident Kashmiri weren’t snapping, shouting and barking at each other like madmen. Perhaps the confines of the moving metal box and the perpetual periodic rattling and rustling of train’s coaches evoked a sense of camaraderie in this unlikely group.
The train was somewhere between Pathankot and Jalandhar when in the lazy haze of after-lunch hours the boys opened their laptop. I was having my dose of weird surrealism through Kafka’s short story “In the Penal Colony” when I heard Tabu’s not-so satisfying Kashmiri accent, “Kis taraf hain aap?” and Narendra Jha’s convincing mannerism, “Zindagi ki”. The Kashmiri boys were watching Haider, yes a cliché, I know but it is what happened. The uncomfortable “between a rock and a hard place” situation was initiated by this question;” Have you seen this film?” asked by one of the boys to the army man. “It’s on Kashmir issue, very accurate” added the other one.
“It’s an adaptation of Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, Kashmir is just a backdrop” The compulsive pacifist side of my bi-polar public alter-ego spoke. “Still, it’s the only true portrayal of Kashmir in Bollywood” said one cousin in slightly stern voice. “Oh! Is it that movie, the one that shows army as killers?” asked the concerned army man.  “Yes...”  “Actually the killer is., well I don’t want to kill the suspense but not the army, if you watch it you’ll know”. I wanted to rescue the happy, welcoming. Post card image of Kashmir in front of the nice Gujarati boy so that he speaks of J&K in positive light in front of his peers in Mumbai. Somehow it mattered to me.
Haider film was still fresh and a big issue at that time. News channels have pounced on it to create endless, absurd debates with the people who have no say whatsoever on the Kashmir issue or the film. It might have acted as the initiator of the whole, “freedom of expression” debacle.  I personally was blown away by the film. Once I was called “Muslim at heart” in a passive aggressive manner by a smiling idiotic, hyper nationalist roommate in Mumbai when I defended the filmmaker’s choice to have a take on the issue.
The army man had reservations in many scenes but was gripped by the plot and what he called “apt behaviour of these actors as Kashmiris.” The boys were thrilled by the fact that they were conducting a personal viewing of the film for an army man. They felt it a moral responsibility to explain various nuances of the film like what “Ikhwaan-e-muslameen” is, why in the mid-90s it was a huge risk to cross the downtown bridge and how Anantnag is also called Islamabad.  The army man was silent for most of the film except a few reserved displays of disagreement. Perhaps the maturity of age, civilian dress, absence of weapon and shrill, testing duty at the check-post made him a calm elderly man who doesn’t get carried away with the passions of young, excitable boys.
In the second half the film shifted towards the conflict of Hamlet and army man was engulfed in the plot just when in the Lal chowk scene, Haider’s charcter starts rambling about, “Is paar bhi lenge azadi, us paar bhi lenge azadi, arrey leke rahenge Azaadi!”  The army man was clearly disappointed with Indians making such films yet he watched the whole film, Hamlet sure is very intriguing. The film ended and the silence followed without any harsh confrontations and I was a bit relaxed. The nice Gujarati boy too was day dreaming about some unknown fantasy.  “It’s an okay film, but doesn’t show army’s predicament” the army man announced to no-one specific.  One cousin instantly replied, “Maybe you weren’t stationed here in 90s. Have you heard the stories of fake encounters of opportunist JKP and half widows?” the boys threw in some more points, somehow the army man’s approval of Kashmiri plight was important to them. At one point both parties did agreed that “JKP is corrupt and sinful”, the argument settled for a minute then the other party plucked some other incident. The nice Gujarati guy was even bigger pacifist than the pacifist side of my bi-polar public alter ego. He clearly was getting disgruntled on some attacks on his country’s militia yet he looked at me and exchanged “what-you-gonna-do” smiles. Also he could see that this debate was nowhere near the mindless hysteria and name-calling that happens in times of hashtag-journalism.
The army man shared an anecdote when around 2008 in his first of two postings in J&K; he was stationed at Poonch, during the mass protests and curfews. On one night when curfew was relaxed he was returning from medical store in uniform but without weapon. His foot tripped over a stone and seeing this, three young boys on a motorbike tried to run him over. He jumped and escaped them by inches. He said he really wished he had weapon with him that day. There was a silence. “Poonchi boys are Gujjars and real rogues” was the unanimous verdict.
I have no Poonch connection but it ruffled me a bit plus the army man was falling short on arguments due his low exposure to tabloid fuelled information. I jumped in the argument and blabbered about how, “the new Kashmiri generation is quite rogue and savage at times. Some of them have forgotten the Kashmiri culture. One poll suggested the Kashmiri youth is one of the 10 least hospitable people in India and how a cousin of mine faced many instances of eve teasing in her last visit even when she was accompanied by her family, which was unprecedented earlier.” 
The boys admitted that eve-teasing and unprecedented rogue incidents were increasing in Kashmir. Like everything wrong in the world, they blamed the “goons” of downtown for this. However in their opinion the prime culprit was the “nanga-naach” of Game of Thrones and other such series and Bollywood, which was ironic as they just finished watching a film. The army man supported the young boys earnestly and added, “girls too have forgotten all about modesty” and theKashmiri boys in skinny jeans and dripping hair gel gave the good old “dressing lessons” and “can’t-clap-with-one-hand”. The innocent debater self of my bi-polar public alter ego took over the pacifist and I retaliated with, “the choice of women and modesty lies in beholder’s eyes”.
“What else can you think is the cause of rising rapes?” point infuriated me to the core yet I tried to be composed and told the boys it is not their fault but the lack of healthy female interaction and exposure to a certain idea of modesty. I explained to them with much futility that a few weeks in Bandra, Versova and Colaba might open their minds and the nonsense about dressing and modesty. How the sexual harassment isn’t confined to a particular demographic or to women with particular style of clothing. They were silent but not convinced.
“Son, you don’t get it, boys get excited by these girls in skimpy clothes and sometimes harass even decent girls. These boys should be punished but those girls are also part of the problem” the army man explained in a patronising parent-like tone. “Exactly sir! You are absolutely right” said one of the cousins with brimming smile.
“I am not going to meet them again and hence don’t need to reform them” I told myself and returned to my book. The nice Gujarati boy didn’t know how to react, maybe he was stunned by the remarks of army man and Kashmiri boys but it didn’t reflect clearly on his face. Our eyes met and he gave a brief smile and said, “It is what it is”. Pacifist!
It was around 7 o clock in the evening and army man expressed a desire to have Kashmiri “Bakarkhani” with tea and to his pleasant surprise the boys were carrying some with them. They started to bond over tea and food again. Divided by political turmoil and century old “conflict” but united by blatant misogyny and millenniums old patriarchy.
At Ambala station, a family entered the compartment with all seats in our compartment except one three coaches down. They requested me first to exchange the seat probably because I was with least amount of luggage. I agreed instantly.
My new seat was same side upper berth and the new compartment mates slept almost the entire remainder journey. They were still in the restlessness and rigour of Vaishno devi pilgrimage. I kept silent for the rest of 20 hours of journey, enjoyed my book and sights from the window and pondered on the perpetual periodic rattling and rustling of train’s coaches. 
















 









Saturday, 3 June 2017

A DEATH IN THE GUNJ

Due to a very lucky coincidence I was in Delhi yesterday and was able to watch this exquisite film there, it hasn’t released in Jammu. So what is so exquisite about it? It has the same quality to it that a good piece of literature has; the storyteller really wants you to know this story, as well as she knows it.

We have all been “Shutu” (central character played by Vikrant Massey) at some point in our lives; we all have known a “shutu”, we all have used our “friendly” abuse of machismo on a younger cousin, a junior, a friend, a victim. We don’t care how our playing the “alpha male” of the group, effects the weakling and for what? To assure ourselves of our masculinity on the expense of someone vulnerable than us. If a person is born with a pair of testicles, he is a man, he don’t need to prove it.
This film talks about the self-approval that men need of their masculinity, (the "you need to man-up" talks) it also deals how even the more “independent” women play with the same rules and could be as narrow minded about masculinity, (In one scene Mimi (Kalki’s character tells Shutu, “you are so pretty, you could have been a girl"). It talks about a lot of things resembling a talk in the lawn after a sumptuous lunch on a lazy, sunny winter afternoon. It talks really well and talks “exquisitely”.
The best thing about the film is definitely Konkona Sen Sharma’s direction, she is a sure, composed and mature director, nowhere has it appeared to be her first film.The setting and the era is so well placed, the British Raj hangover and its contrast with the local tribal people (which is very subtle) thankfully this one doesn't show tribals "Daanavs" or their women seducing the "city babus" which is the popular notion in "civilized" society.
All the departments, production design, costume, camera, music(Ah! what music) are in-sync with the story they all are telling together and never overpower each other. Amidst actors like Om Puri, Ranveer Shorey, Tilotama Shome, Tanuja, Gulshan Deviah, it’s Vikrant Massey who steals the show as “Shutu”. He is there every moment, he breathes as Shutu, you want to talk to him, you want to play the father figure he craves for and tell him he is alright and you care. You want to care for him and show him that you care.
Please, please if you ever think of “Indian cinema is shit n all” it’s because these films don’t get good enough release but those of you who have it playing in their cities, please don’t wait for the torrent or Netflix, watch it in Cinema Hall because that is where good Cinema belongs. It’s definitely not the greatest film ever made, but what makes it beautiful is that it doesn’t makes any such promise. It is what it is, a story the storyteller really wants to share.

Monday, 15 May 2017

The Noble Pursuit of Mediocrity

In recent years a common factor among the people that I meet is the dissatisfaction with their respective lives. A whole lot of people I know are quitting the comfortable jobs after working for a couple of years. Some of them are planning to do so in sometime. The strange part is that some of them are pursuing their unconventional dream jobs so to say, with handsome salary packages and this fact comes as a surprise to someone like me who is more or less unemployed trying to find a way to break in to a world which is still a distant dream.
This disillusionment of perpetual tedium of office life isn’t a new phenomenon but the apparent nature of its occurrence is something that was missing from our earlier generations. During a discussion, the primary response of my parents on this topic was that, “today’s people are unappreciative of the things they have so easily”. Maybe it is one of the factors; another one could be the unrealistic desire of some alien happiness aroused from the “meme culture” of social media. This constant overload of information and opinion forming machinery is causing a mass-numbing of sensory and presenting a regulated picture of “Happiness”.
In my opinion this magical happiness doesn’t exist. Happiness is truly the by-product of a productive day, with productivity being a new thought produced or a new experience cultivated through affection and stimulation. Now by this statement I don’t want to induce the philosophical mumbo-jumbo like work productivity isn’t productivity, a new thought produced in fact forms the basis of work productivity, but when this thought is repeated for mass production, it isn’t actually a new product anymore, rather just a perpetual cycle of the initial igniting process.  So even in traditional work culture the productivity is kept alive by constantly improving an existing product, making upgrades and tackling with upcoming problems.
The biggest victim of this disenchantment with the “present scenario” is the young middle class population. The middle class today is very different from the middle class a few decades ago. Today the fight is not for the basics. The biggest travesty of the middle class today is that they work their whole lives to be the first copy of the elite. They want to struggle and hustle their whole life working mindlessly towards getting closer to the things which are available to the elite by default. It really is a sad position to be in when a person is willing to work whole life with the only motif of increasing the “buying capacity”. In the popular media, this fight is portrayed as righteous and just. This mind-set is the fodder for the ruling class, be it political ruling class or the big giants corporate. The power lies with the powerful by keeping people smart enough to be efficient workers and dumb enough to be a mindless customer.
This pursuit of mediocrity is what makes it easy to churn huge profits. After decades of TV and advertisement intake everything that is popular is highly mediocre. Be it music, food, cinema, writing, Television, poetry, people, jobs. 
This doesn’t mean that earning a decent living isn’t a noble pursuit, it surely is. It is a prerequisite that one should be able to have a shelter, three square meals, clothing, education and a proper healthcare for themselves and their families. But once you are at that financial milestone maybe it’s time to think beyond that and beyond that isn’t just the up-gradation of shelter, clothes or car.
So maybe this unrest is the good thing. Something new might come up with the unrest of our generation. All those feeling dissatisfied with their lives are probably at the threshold of arising self-esteem not letting them living a life of disbelief, which might one day take them to self-actualization as per Maslow’s hierarchy.

Getting a job or making money is a necessity but not with the consequence of living life as a person living in a shell, too formulated to stimulate thought process,
 But what do I know? I am just jobless person.    

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

शब्द सस्ते हो गए हैं।

इस दौर का सबसे सटीक विवरण यह है की यह "सोशल मीडिया" का दौर है। लघबघ 2010 से इसका बोलबाला है पहले देश में mobile  phones , फिर wifi इंटरनेट और अब smart  phones और 4G डाटा की क्रांति है  जी हाँ, इस दौर में यही सबसे बड़ी क्रांति है नए दौर के नए चलन के चलते हिंदुस्तान में सोशल मीडिया के करीब 450 million  users  हैं ।  इतने ज़्यादा उपभोगता माने उतना ही ज़्यादा propoganda , advertisement , demand  and  supply  ।
हर क्रांति की तरह इस क्रांति के भी नफे-नुक्सान दोनों ही हैं. नफे गिनवाने की आवशयकता नहीं है, सब जानते हैं, हाँ नुक्सान को नज़र अंदाज़ करना इंसानी फितरत है राजनीतिक दलों (दल्लों ) का यह सबसे आसान और सबसे अधिक प्रभावशाली propaganda  tool  बन चूका है आप खुद बड़ी बड़ी agencies  एवं corporations को अपना उठना बैठना, पसंद नापसंद , दिनचर्या बताते हैं और वह उस information  को regulate  करके आपको और ज़ोर शोर से अपना सामान बेच सकते हैं, privacy की धज्जियाँ उड़ जाती हैं सोशल मीडिया पे, लेकिन इन सब विषयों पे बेहेस हो सकती है और लम्बा discussion  छिड़ सकता है , एक चीज़ है जो पुरज़ोर हो रही है वह है की यहां शब्द सस्ते हो चुके हैं
आज से कई वर्ष पहले, दुसरे विश्व युद्ध और आज़ादी के पहले और बाद का जो दौर था विह idealism का दौर था वह और उसके बाद की कुछ पीडियों में , साहित्य पड़े हुए, समाज और उसकी व्यवस्था की एक अलग समझ रखने वाले, इश्क़ में रमे हुए दिलवाले ही कलम उठाने की हिमाकत करते थे। यदि अपने लिखित शब्द समाज तक पहुंचाने हो और खुद को लेखक का दर्जा देना हो, यदि सामाजिक टिपण्णी देने का साहस दिखाना हो तो खु-बा-खुद यह दिलवाले एक वैराग सा इख़्तियार कर लिया करते थे
विचार व्यक्त करने की क्रिया भी कठिन थी। जिस बारे में लेखन हो उससे जुडी किताबे पड़ी जाती थी, चाय वाले के यहां लगने वाली शाम की महविल की तकरीरों को गौर-तलब सुना जाता था। ज़िन्दगी में कुछ चीज़ें झिंझोड़ती थी तभी कलम उठती थी।  पहले तो कागज़ पे सीधा जज़्बात उड़ेल दिए जाते थे, फिर उसके कई संशोधन होते थे। कई बार एहि क्रिया साधने के बाद अखबारों और बौद्धिक पत्रिकाओं के दफ्तरों के चक्कर लगते थे। अपनी राजनीतिक और सामाजिक विचारधारा के मशालची प्रकाशन घरों में भी लेखन प्रकाशित करवाना मुश्किल था। इस सबके चलते हुए समाज की अठखेलिआं , माँ-बाप की परेशानियां, बेरोज़गारी और मुफलिसी की ज़िदगी का एक नकारात्मक साया, फिर कहीं जाके अगर आपकी लेखनी प्रकाशित हो भी गयी तो पड़ते समय उसमे खामियां नज़र आती होंगी, कई विचार राजनीतिक और सम्पादकों के दबाव के चलते अपना दम तोड़ देते होंगे।
इतनी कीमत चुकानी पड़ती थी अपने शब्दों को समाज के बीच परोसने में ताकि उसपे एक बौद्धिक वाद-विवाद हो सके। हालांकि सभी लेखक मुफलिसी के शहर के बेनाम बाशिंदे नहीं थे, कई रईसों और साहूकारों के संतानों ने भी कलम उठायी, मसलन खुशवंत सिंह, लेकिन शब्दों के प्रति और शब्दकला के प्रति ईमानदारी बराबर थी। लेखनियाँ तथ्यों एवं निजी तजुर्बों से भरपूर होती थी।
मगर आज का दौर अलग है। सोशल मीडिया की इस दुनिया ने एक समानतापूर्वक प्लेटफार्म खड़ा किया है जिसमे कोई भी किसीसे सीधा सवाल पूछ सकता है और जो सवाल "viral " हो, अमूमन उसका जवाब भी आता है।
इस बाहरी छवि में एक सशक्तिकरण और समानता की झलक दिखती है पर इसके चलते जो phenomenon प्रचलित है जिसे "self -commodification" कहा जा सकता है, हर एक को हर एक मुद्दे पे प्रतिक्रिया देना फ़र्ज़ महसूस होता है, लेकिन उस मुद्दे पे चिंतन मंथन, विचार-विमर्श करना, एक तर्कसंगत खोज बिलकुल आवश्यक नहीं लगती। इंसान की एक आदिम परवर्ती है, अपने आप को योद्धा मानने की, और यह सोशल मीडिया के योद्धा बिना परिश्रम और कुर्बानी के ही योद्धा बनना चाहते हैं। हाँ लेकिन युद्ध की एक युक्ति यह बखूबी जानते हैं, औरतों का शोषण। किसी भी औरत को, जिससे विचारों से सहमत नहीं उससे "रंडी" बुला दिया, "बलात्कार की धमकियाँ" "बीच चौराहे पे acid फेंक सकता हु" इस बात का घुमान, आम है इन योद्धाओं के लिए ।
इन योद्धाओं के लिए कभी भी कोई भी "terrorist" और "पाकिस्तानी", "खालिस्तानी"  हो जाता है और कभी भी कोई भी, "nazi ", "RSS agent" और "islamophobe "।
यह कहना बिलकुल गलत है की बेवकूफों की तादात भाड़ गयी है, हाँ उन्हें एक जरिया ज़रूर मिल गया है अपनी बेवकूफी की नुमाइश करने का। शब्दों का बहुत पुराना इतिहास है, इतिहास रचयता यही हैं, इन्ही के कारण इंसानी सभ्यता है, इन्ही के कारण वह धर्म हज़ारों सालों से चल रहे हैं जो इंसानो को जीने का मक़सद भी दे रहे हैं और कातिल भी बना रहे हैं, इन्ही के कारण विचार जीवित हैं !
 विचार की अभिवयक्ति का हक़ है और बहुत ज़रूरी भी है, लेकिन उससे भी ज़रूरी है एक ज़िम्मेदारी, समाज के प्रति, नैतिकता के प्रति, तर्कसंगत सोच के प्रति, शब्दों की ताकत के प्रति, 
लेकिन शब्दों का क्या, शब्द तो सस्ते हो गए हैं।